2026:HHC:8383 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arb. Case No. 398 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2026. M/s T.K. System ...Petitioner. Versus Institute of Integrated Ruval Development ...Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Suhani Gautam, Advocate, for Mr. Amit K. Vaid, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file afresh on same cause of action in view of the observation, made on 09.01.2026, which reads as under:- “Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for time to seek instructions whether any notice for appointment of Arbitrator was issued to the respondent and whether the petition would be maintainable in absence of the same.” 2. Permission granted. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (G. S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice 20th March, 2026 (kck) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?