Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7246 (UTT)

VIKAS YADAV ALIAS VICKY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/1175/2026 · 2026-06-16

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4899 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1175/2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Siddharth Bankoti, learned counsel for the applicant through Legal Aid. 2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. Tumual Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State submits that remand was sought for recovery of weapon and vehicle used in the commission of crime and the remand was granted and thereafter on the pointing out of the present applicant recovery was made, therefore, the instant petition is now rendered infructuous. 4. In view of the statement as given by the learned State Counsel the instant C528 petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 16.06.2026 Parul 2026:UHC:4899