Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:17597
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1792 of 2026 1 - Bhojkumar Patel S/o Gugan Prasad Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Kabaripali, Tahsil Dabhra District- Sakti (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Hemant Kumar S/o Gugan Prasad Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Kabaripali, Tahsil Dabhra District- Sakti (Chhattisgarh)
... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resources Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector, Sakti , District- Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Revenue Cum Land Acquisition Officer Dabhara District- Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Executive Engineer Wrd, Champa Division Head Office Champa, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.)
... Respondents (Cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioners : Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate. For State-Respondent(s) : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. Advocate General. (Hon’ble Shri Justice
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
)
Order on Board
17/04/2026
1. Heard. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.04.17 18:24:51 +0530
2
2. This petition has been preferred by petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court kindly be pleased to direct the respondents for conducting spot inspection of the land of the petitioner and once it is found that land of the petitioner is under submergence on account of construction of Ghatoi Dam then they may be directed to pay compensation with all statutory benefits like interest and additional amount under Section 80 and 30(3) of Act 2013 within time frame. 10.2 That this Hon’ble Court kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authorities for deciding the representation of the petitioner. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondents for initiation of acquisition proceeding under the provision of Act 2013. 10.4 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the owner of land bearing Khasra Nos.164/6, 282/2, 282/5, area 0.0730, 0.2180, 0.0490 hectares respectively, situated at Village Kabaripali, Tahsil Dabhra, District Sakti (CG). It is further submitted that after construction of the Ghatoi Dam, a portion of the petitioners’ agricultural land has come under the submergence area of the said Dam. However, no acquisition proceedings have been drawn with respect to the petitioners’ land falling under the submergence area. Therefore, it is prayed that at this stage liberty may be granted to the petitioners to file a fresh representation for redressal of their grievances, and a direction be issued to the respondent authorities (respondents No.2 & 3) to decide the representation, initiate acquisition proceedings, and grant compensation to the petitioners.
3
4. Learned State counsel submits that the present petition may be disposed of with appropriate direction.
5. Having considered the limited prayer made by counsel for petitioners, without entering into the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before respondent authorities along with all necessary documents and a copy of this order, within a period of 15 days from today. In the eventuality of filing such representation by the petitioners, the respondent authorities are
directed to get demarcated the subject land of petitioners within a further period of 45 days from the date of filing of representation, and if it is found that the said land of petitioners has come in submergence/affected area of the said Dam, then appropriate proceedings be initiated for grant of compensation to the petitioners.
6. The aforesaid proceedings with regard to acquisition and grant of compensation be concluded within a further period of 90 days from the date of demarcation of aforesaid land of petitioners.
7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands
disposed of.
8. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No
order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar