Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7243 (CAL)

AMIR SK. AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/794/2026 · 2026-04-09

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.04.2026 Sl. No.71 Ct. 28 NB C.R.M (A) 794 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Suti PS Case No.100/2026 dated 04.02.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/126(2)(3)(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Amir Sk & Ors. … petitioners Sk. Humayan Reza …for the petitioners. Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta, Ms. Ankita Paul. …for the State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that there was a scuffle between co-villagers over an issue of construction of a road. There are case and counter case. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He relies on the statements of witnesses and the injury report, which, however, does not show infliction of any grievous injury. Considering the above and the other materials available in the case diary, although I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, the movement of the petitioners shall remain restricted for a limited period. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid 2 down under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and on further condition that the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation and shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once a week till submission of report in final form and shall stay outside the jurisdiction of Suti Police Station except for meeting the Investigating Officer or attending the jurisdictional Court or casting their vote in the coming Assembly Elections. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)