Sunil Sood vs. Goel Agencies Cr.MP(M) No. 460 of 2026 30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate for the respondent. The present application has been led for condonation of 160 days delay in ling the present revision. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that he has no objection in case the present application is allowed. In view of this statement, the present application is allowed and the delay in ling the revision is ordered to be condoned. The present application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision (ST) No. 1982 of 2026 The delay in ling the revision has been ordered to be condoned vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 460 of 2026. Petition be registered. Notice. Mr. Sachin Sunail, learned counsel appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Copy of the revision be supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent. Record be requisitioned. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the matter has been compromised between the parties. In view this statement, petitioner is directed to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount before Member, Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, as per the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore S. Brocar and another (2025) SCC Online SC 2069 and list the matter thereafter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 30th March, 2026 (Nikita)