Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7238 (JHR)

EHSAN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3395/2026 · 2026-04-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11958 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3395 of 2026 Ehsan Ansari, aged about 35 years, son of Late Nabi Miyan, Resident of Village -Rochap, P.O. & P.S.-Patratu, district Ramgarh, Jharkhand. … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … ... Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY --------- For the Petitioners: :Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State :Mr.Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P. --------- 02 /Dated: 23.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No. 33 of 2026, instituted under Section 305 (e)/ 317 (2), 317(4), 329(3), 61(2) (b), 112(2) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of theft of 850 metres of copper wire, which were in pieces, from the plant of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2026, as mentioned at para 11 of the bail application. Learned counsel for the petitioner has files supplementary affidavit and the same is taken on record. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during trial of the case and he will not go to or near the place of occurrence i.e. the land of the informant where the alleged occurrence took place, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC at Ramgarh in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No. 33 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case and he undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during trial of the case and he will not go to or near the place of occurrence, during the pendency of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 23.04. 2026 MM /Cp.03