HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32975 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Ankit Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri A.K. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 210 of 2026, under Sections 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Saroorpur, District Meerut, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no cogent evidence against the applicant. He is not named in the Case Crime No. 184 of 2024 u/s 504, 506 IPC. The said case is punishable with imprisonment below seven years, and the charge sheet has not yet been submitted, as such, he is entitled for bail. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further argued that the applicant is languishing in jail since 20.8.2026 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground that the criminal history of the applicant has not been properly explained, as he has not appended the order thereof. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Tiwari, Rajat Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohin Tyagi .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the applicant had not appended the order of the case crime number 184 of 2024, the parameters of Section 19(4) of U.P. Gangsters Act, do not stand fulfilled, as such, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 8. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously as early as possible in view of the principle, if there is no legal impediment. 9. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. 10. The Registrar Compliance is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the trial court concerned for necessary compliance. September 16, 2026 Shalini BAIL No. 32975 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad