APHC010265002015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 26354 OF 2015 Between: 1. Smt.G.Lakshmi, D/o.G.Malleswararao, Occ:Business, R/o.D.No.3-7-189, Kathiri street,Srikakulam ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its PRincipal Secretary Energy Department,Secretariat,Lower Tank Bund,Hyderabad 2. Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution company Ltd, rep.by its Managing Director,Visakhapatnam 3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation circle, APEPDCL Ltd, Srikakulam ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent inissuing the impugned proceedings in LR.No.SE/O/SKL/D.ET/ADE.Comml/AE.C/D.No.886/15 dated 7.8.2015 as illegal,arbitrary,and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the prcoeedings issued by the 3rd respondent in LR.No.SE/O/SKL/D.ET/ADE.Comml/AE.C/D.No.886/2015 dated 7.8.2015 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 34241 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the 3rd respondent to stay all further proceedings in LR.No.SE/O/SKL/D.ET/ADE.Comml/AE.C/D.No.886/2015 dated 7.8.2015 IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WPMP 147864 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA Counsel for the Respondents: V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR ENERGY (AP) The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 26354 OF 2015 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 14.08.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP 4 17 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 26354 OF 2015 14.08.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP