Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 723 (JHR)

UTTAM KUMAR DAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/351/2024 · 2026-01-09

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:657 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 351 of 2024 1. Uttam Kumar Dan, aged about 39 years, son of Shanta Pada Dan, resident of village Bhagabandh, P.O. Barbendia, P.S. Nirsha, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 2. Dulal Prasad Lohar, aged about 42 years, son of Ashu Lohar, resident of village Magurdih, P.O. Barbendia, P.S. Nirsha, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 3. Subrata Kumar Tewary, aged about 41 years, son of Rama Pada Tewary, resident of village Beldanga, P.O. Barbendia, P.S. Nirsha, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 4. Tapas Kumar Pathak, aged about 38 years, son of Ram Sadhan Pathak, resident of village Sirpuria, P.O. Madanpur, P.S. Nirsha, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Shri Bhutnath Rajwar, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S., & District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 3. Shri Atul Kumar Choubey, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Bokaro, P.O., P.S., & District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. 4. Shri Rajesh Kumar Paswan, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Jamtara, P.O., P.S., & District- Jamtara, Jharkhand. 5. Shri Mukul Raj, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Pakur, P.O., P.S., & District- Pakur, Jharkhand. 6. Shri Ashish Kumar Hembrom, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka, P.O., P.S., & District- Dumka, Jharkhand. 7. Sri. Vinay Kumar, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Giridih, P.O., P.S., & District- Giridih, Jharkhand 8. Shri Toni Premraj Toppo, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar, PO, P.S., & District- Deoghar, Jharkhand. 9. Shri Mithilesh Jha, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The 2026:JHHC:657 2 District Superintendent of Education, Sahibganj, P.O., P.S., & District- Sahibganj, Jharkhand. 10. Ms. Mithila Tudu, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Godda, P.O., P.S., & District- Godda, Jharkhand. 11. Smt. Alka Jaiswal, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Koderma, P.O., P.S., & District- Koderma, Jharkhand. 12. Shri Santosh Gupta, The District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S., & District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. 13. Shri Rajram Sah, father's name not known to the Petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh, P.O., P.S., & District- Ramgarh, Jharkhand. 14. Shri Dinesh Mishra, The District Superintendent of Education, Chatra, P.O., P.S., & District- Chatra, Jharkhand. ... … Opposite party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to Sr. SC-I -------- Order No. 05/Dated: 09th January 2026 Defect pointed out by the Registry is hereby ignored. 2. This contempt case has been preferred by the petitioners alleging willful disobedience and deliberate violation of the order dated 16.02.2022 passed in W.P.(S) No. 3242 of 2019. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this contempt case with liberty to file a fresh writ application as the claim of the petitioners has been rejected. 4. Accordingly, the instant contempt case stands disposed of with liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 9th January 2026 Amit Uploaded 13/1 /2026