Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010089162026 2026:GAU-AS:7567- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./80/2026 MS HASINA BEGUM TALUKDAR AND ANR. D/O ISKONDAR ALI TALUKDAR, BLOCK MIS MANAGER, SALCHAPRA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK, VILL. AND P.O. SALCHAPRA, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 788801 2: SUMIT CHAKRABORTY S/O- SAMARESH CHAKRABORTY BLOCK MIS MANAGER COLLEGE ROAD SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 78800 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006 IN THE DIST. OF KAMRUP M, ASSAM. 2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 781037 DIST- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 3:THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 781037 DIST- KAMRUP(M) Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CACHAR DIST SILCHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 5:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 6:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SONAI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788006 7:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SALCHAPRA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788814 8:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BARJALENGA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 78811 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 01-06-2026 Heard Ms. S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. Page No.# 3/3 H. M. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. The order dated 06.02.2026 passed in WP(C) No. 3047/2018 and WP(C) No. 1070/2018, which is sought to be reviewed in the present proceeding, is an order dismissing the said writ petitions for non- prosecution. This Court is of the considered view that, once a proceeding has been dismissed for non-prosecution, the appropriate remedy available to the aggrieved party is to seek restoration or recall of the order by filing an appropriate application. In view of the above, the present review petition being not maintainable, is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for restoration/recall of the order dated 06.02.2026, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant