Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7224 (JHR)

SUNNY KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./12181/2025 · 2026-04-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:12291 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.12181 of 2025 ------ Sunny Kumar, aged about 32 years, S/o Dilip Saw, R/o Sarvoday Nagar, Chas, P.O. & P.S.-Chas, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated- 27-04-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Kasmar P.S. Case No.56 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No.800 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted the motorcycle of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and without putting him on T.I.P. as mentioned in para-06 of supplementary affidavit, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.09.2025 as is evident from para-16 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat, Bokaro in connection with Kasmar P.S. Case No.56 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No.800 of 2021 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 27/04/2026 Abhiraj/