PONNAGANTI SRINIVASA RAO v. THE ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANOTHER
WP/12936/2005 · 2026-08-13
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7217 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7217 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010157132005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12936/2005 Between:
1. PONNAGANTI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.APPA RAO R/O.D.NO.7C-8-13/1 NEAR POTTI SRIRAMULU CHOWK EASTERN STREET, CHATAPURRU ROAD ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANOTHER, REP BY SECRETARY, GRUHAKALPA, NAMPALLY HYDERABAD. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT, SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declarign the action of the respondents in not considering petitioners case appointment in the vacancies of Group IV available in the Subordinate Offices as on 30-6-1993 according to my merit, as per the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.8151 dt.20.7.95 taking into consideration of the common orders made in the batch of Writ Petitions ie W.P.No.6746, 12263, 12296,12297,12298, 12299,12300, 12322,123737,12338,12339,12340,12341,12342,122243,nc 12344 of 2004 and 5777,6590,6591,6592,8920,8955,9147,9155 and 10286, inspite of petitioners representation dt.26.5.2005requesting the respondent sto consider my case at par with the petitioners in the said batch W.Ps., as unjust discriminatory and violative of articles 14,16 and 21 Constitution of India and other consequential reliefsin the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders. 2
IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 16425 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reserve one post in Group-IV "C" Service till the disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may kindly grant the leave to file the counter affidavit in captioned Writ Petition for proper adjudication of the matter in the interest of justice and pas IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to accord the Petitioner permission to change his counsel by dispensing with the requirement of filing a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the previous counsel, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant permission to implead me and other proposed persons as Writ Petitioners in the present WP/12936/2005 of Ponnaganti Srinivasa Rao and in the Miscellaneous Petitions, and to make consequential amendment in the cause title of the Writ Petition and wherever the context requires, as otherwise we will be put to irreparable loss and hardship, and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to condone the delay of 304 days in filing the Implead Petition seeking permission to implead me and other proposed persons as Writ Petitioners in the present WP/12936/2005 of Ponnaganti Srinivasa Rao and in the Miscellaneous Petitions, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M RAVINDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. G.SEENA KUMAR SC For APPSC
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner, appearing online, is not ready to proceed with the matter and is taking assistance from the person beside him. In view of the same, the matter is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 14.08.2026 SSA
4
41 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 12936/2005
14.08.2026 SSA