Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7213 (UTT)

KUNDAN LAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1592/2026 · 2026-06-17

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010105422026 2026:UHC:4995 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS No.1592 of 2026 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Vinoda Nand Barthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, through video conferencing. 2. Mr. S.S. Chaudhary and Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, learned S.C.s’ for the State. 3. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 18.04.2026 whereby the petitioner was issued a warning by respondent no.4-In charge, Chief Education Officer, Chamoli. The warning was issued to the petitioner after adverting to the reply to the show cause notice issued by respondent no.4 on 27.03.2026. 4. After going through the reply to the show cause notice the same was not found satisfactory and accordingly the warning was issued to the petitioner. 5. The warning is not a penalty provided under the Uttaranchal Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 2003. 6. It is nothing but a simple warning given by respondent no.4, therefore this Court does not want to interfere in this writ petition. 7. Accordingly the writ petition stands dismissed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.06.2026 SK UKHC010105422026 2026:UHC:4995