Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7213 (CAL)

AMAN ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/1013/2026 · 2026-04-09

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 12 April 9, 2026 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 1013 of 2026 Reject An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Burtolla P.S. Case No.13 of 2026 dated 24.01.2026 under Sections 118(2)/54 of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Aman Roy … petitioner Mr. Gunjan Kumar Singh Mr. Vijay Verma Mr. Prakash Mishra … for the petitioner Ms. Sreyashee Biswas Ms. Nandini Chatterjee … for the State Report filed by the State is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. Two other co-accused have been granted bail. It is further prayed that the petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail on any stringent condition. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail, relies on the report and the case diary and submits that as per the enquiry, it has been found, that the petitioner, Aman Roy, is the same person as Aman Das, who is mentioned in the FIR. She also relies on the statements of the victim and another eyewitness, and the injury report which shows serious injuries inflicted on different parts of 2 the body, including a vital part like scalp. The assault was made by a knife. Considering the above and the other materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. [ (Jay Sengupta, J.)