Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7212 (UTT)

KISHAN SINGH BISHT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/287/2023 · 2026-06-18

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010106572023 2026:UHC:5033-DB SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSB No.287 of 2023 Kishan Singh Bisht --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned Counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Dy.A.G. for the State. 3. Learned Counsel for petitioner makes a statement at bar that the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time. 4. In view of aforesaid submission, present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 18.06.2026 Rdang