APHC010390192026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE 19th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 21040/2026 Between: 1. KUMPATI SAI AMRUTHA, , W/O. ANIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. 2-89, BC COLONY,THUMUCHERLA VILLAGE, KANAGANAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. -515641 2. KUMPATI SUMALATHA,, W/O. NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. THUMUCHERLA VILLAGE, KANAGANAPAILE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. - 515641 3. KUMPATI GOWRI,, W/O. RAMANJI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. THUMUCHERLA VILLAGE, KANAGANAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. -515641 4. KUMPATI GAYATRI,, W/O. BOYA GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. THUMUCHERLA VILLAGE, KANAGANAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. -515641 5. KUMPATI ANIL KUMAR,, S/O. THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. 3-151, BC COLONY,THUMUCHERLA VILLAGE KANAGANAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. -515641 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522237 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM DIVISION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. -515641 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KANAGANAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.- 515641 4. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, KANAGANAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. - 515641 5. THE VILLAGE SURVEYOR, THUMUCHERLA VILLAGE, KANAGANAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. -515641 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3 to 5 respondents, in interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners house sites properties and trying to disposes the petitioners from their respective properties in respect of Sy.no. 418-1C1 for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis.45/2006 dated.05.02.2006 Sy.no. 418-1C1 for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 46/2006 dated.05.02.2006 Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 47/2006 dated.05.02.2006 Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 48/2006 dated.05.02.2006 Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 49/2006 dated.06.02.2006 Situated at Thumucherla village, Kanaganapalle Mandal, Anantapur District, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 300-A of the Constitution of India, 7Comment Highlight and contrary to the express provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971. Consequently, direct the respondents no.3 and 5 not to interfere and not to disposes the petitioners from their respective house sites properties in respect of Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 45/2006 dated.05.02.2006 Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 46/2006 dated.05.02.2006 Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 47/2006 dated.05.02.2006 Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 48/2006 dated.05.02.2006 Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 49/2006 dated.06.02.2006 Situated at Thumucherla village, Kanaganapalle Mandal, Anantapur District. And pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents no.3 and 5 not to interfere and not to disposes the petitioners from their respective house sites properties in respect of: • Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 45/2006 dated.05.02.2006 • Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 46/2006 dated.05.02.2006 • Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 47/2006 dated.05.02.2006 • Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 48/2006 dated.05.02.2006 • Sy.no. 418-1 Cl for an extent of Ac.0-10 vide. P.C. Dis 49/2006 dated.06.02.2006 Situated at Thumucherla village, Kanaganapalle Mandal, Anantapur District, and grant such other relief as may be deemed fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri K.Aravind, learned counsel representing Sri K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 2. Petitioners, 5 in number, file the above writ petition to declare the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in attempting to dispossess the petitioners from an extent of Ac.0.10 cents each in S.No.418-1C1 of Thumucherla village, Kanaganapalle Mandal, Anantapur District, without issuing any notices, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been in possession and enjoyment of the aforementioned extents of land. The then Tahsildar issued possession certificates, and the copies of the possession certificates are filed as Ex.P1. 4. Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, on instructions of the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, would submit that possession certificates relied upon by the petitioners are limited to the purpose of obtaining subsidy and loan from APSHCL and the authorities will follow due process in respect of the subject land. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping the writ petition pending and inviting a counter will not serve any purpose. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing the respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere with the extent of Ac.0.10 cents each in S.No.418-1C1 of Thumucherla village, Kanaganapalle Mandal, Anantapur District, without following due procedure. No order as to costs. It is made clear that this Court has not recorded any finding concerning the title of the petitioners, in respect of the subject land. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD