Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 721 (AP)

T. SOMASEKHAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/9437/2026 · 2026-04-09

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010168802026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 9437 OF 2026 Between: 1. T. SOMASEKHAR, AGED 38 YEARS S/O. T. VENKATA RAMANA, H.NO.25/450/2A/1243, YSR NAGAR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT - 518501. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522238. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT518502. 4. THE NANDYAL MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT518502. 5. THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, NANDYAL MUNICIPALITY, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT-518502. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri B. Gnunender Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Thathireddy Ashok Srivastava, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Ms. D. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning and Sri Gudapati Lakshmi Narayana, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities. 2. Sri Gudapati Lakshmi Narayana, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Nandyal Municipality dated 01.04.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instruction would indicate that Respondent No.4 has not only admitted the due amount and but also stated that the net amount payable to the Writ Petitioner is Rs.17,02,939/-. The Written Instruction would also indicate that the amount is pending due to non-allocation of Budget by the Writ Petitioner. 4. Having considered the above facts, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition, with a direction to the Official Respondents, including Respondent Nos.2 and 4, to complete the entire administrative process, both inter-departmental and intra-departmental, by way of mutual cooperation and coordination, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today and transfer the 3 due amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within four (4) weeks thereafter. 5. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit the bank account details to the Competent Authority within four (4) weeks from today for effective compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 10.04.2026 BSK