Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 72096 (MAD)

KIRAN KUMAR v. State rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/4150/2026 · 2026-02-19

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 4150 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 4150 of 2026 Kiran Kumar S/o. Yogan, No.199, Sarathi Nagar 2nd Street, Lakshmipuram, Kolathur, Chennai- 600 099. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police M3 Puzhal Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.25 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: To enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in the Cr. No.25 of 2026 on the fie of the Respondent Police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M. Kousalya For Respondent(s): Mr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate(Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 4150 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.01.2026, for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 309(4), 311, 351(3) of BNS Act 2023 in Crime No.25 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accused approached the defacto complainant who is auto driver and with a knife point robbed a sum of Rs.1,870/- and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been in incarceration since 06.01.2026, and he has been falsely implicated since he was having some previous cases and is ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate(Ctrl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is having 8 previous cases of similar nature and it is not a false case foisted against the petitioner and if the petitioner is granted bail there is likelihood that he will indulge in similar offences. Hence, he opposed for grant https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 4150 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 of bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the fact that it is a case of robbery at knife point and the petitioner is also having 8 previous cases and if the petitioner is granted bail there likelihood that he will indulge in similar offences, hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 19-02-2026 MPA To 1. State rep. by The Inspector of Police M3 Puzhal Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.25 of 2026 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 4150 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.RAJASEKAR, J. MPA CRL OP No. 4150 of 2026 19-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis