Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7207 (ORI)

TAPASWINI PATEL v. THE STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/9467/2026 · 2026-04-22

Sashikanta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P(C) No. 9467 of 2026 Tapaswini Patel …. Petitioner Represented by Mr. U.K. Samal, Advocate -Versus – State of Orissa and Others …. Opp. Parties Represented by Mrs. J. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 22.04.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner’s case is that despite demarcation being conducted over the case land and her land being clearly identified, she is unable to construct a boundary wall over the same because of obstruction being caused by the neighboring land owners. In this regard, she has approached the police authorities, but to no avail. 4. Considering the limited grievance, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Collector, Sundargarh by submitting a representation highlighting her grievance. If such representation is submitted within a week from today, the Collector, Sundargarh shall consider the same and pass necessary orders including directing the police authorities to render necessary assistance. (Sashikanta Mishra) B.C. Tudu Judge Order No. 1. Designation: Sr. Stenographer