( 2026:JHHC:12174 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.350 of 2026 ------ Chanda Verma, aged about 47 years, wife of Ashok Verma, Resident of Mohalla Srikant Road Belabagan, P.O.-Daburgram, P.S.- Deoghar, District-Deoghar. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Uma Sinha wife of Sri Vikash Kumar, 3. Vikash Kumar son of Late Suresh Kumar, Both residents of Mohalla Ramchandrapur, P.O. and P.S.-Jasidih Subdivision, District-Deoghar. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Rajni Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-24-04-2026 Heard the parties. Though, notice has validly been served upon the opposite party no.2 & 3, yet no one turns up on behalf of the opposite party no.2 & 3. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of Acq. Appeal (C) (SJ). No.33 of 2024 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 30.07.2025. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Acq. Appeal (C) (SJ). No.33 of 2024 stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 30.07.2025 for removing the defect pointed out by the stamp reporter peremptorily within three weeks. It is next submitted that due to some severe medical issues, the petitioner could not remove the defect pointed out by the stamp reporter within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said Acq. Appeal (C) (SJ). No.33 of 2024 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 30.07.2025. It is next submitted that non-compliance of peremptory order dated 30.07.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Acq. Appeal (C) (SJ). No.33 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Acq. Appeal (C) (SJ). No.33 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, Acq. Appeal (C) (SJ). No.33 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Acq. Appeal (C) (SJ). No.33 of 2024 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24/04/2026 Abhiraj/