A No. 1008 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 1008 of 2026 AND CS SR NO. 27313 OF 2026 G. Saravanan S/o.Mr.Ganapathy, Residing at No.2/202, Perumal Kovil Street, Mettukuppam, Mugalivakkam, Chennai 600 125. ..Applicant(s) Vs 1.M/s. NTL (India) Private Limited, A Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, Represented by its Directors, Mr.D.Ramesh and Mr.B.Dayanithi, No.11/2, Muthyal Reddy St, Alandur, Chennai 600 016. 2.Mr.D.Ramesh, Director, M/s. NTL (India) Private Limited, 3.Mr.B.Dayanithi, Director, M/s. NTL (India) Private Limited, 4.M/s.Keyon Trans Private Limited, A Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, rep by its Director, Mr.D.Elangovan 5.M/s.NTL Call Taxi Private Limited, A Private Limited Company https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1008 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, Represented by its Directors, Mr.D.Ramesh and Mr.B.Dayanithi 6.M/s.Jaimaruthi Powers (India) Private Ltd., A Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, rep by its Director, Mr.G.Saravanan. 7.M/s.New Travel Lines India Private Limited, A Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, rep by its Director, Mr.R.Baskar 8.Mr.Siva Shanmugan, Proprietor of M/s.SST Automotive, A Proprietary Concern. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This petition has been filed seeking to grant leave to the applicant/plaintiff to file the present suit as against the respondents / defendants 1, 5, 6, 7 & 8 before this Court. For Applicant(s): Mr..K.P. Sanjeev Kumar ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to grant leave to the applicant/plaintiff to file the present suit as against the respondents / defendants 1, 5, 6, 7 & 8 before this Court. 2. According to the applicant, he is the plaintiff in the main suit filed for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1008 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 declaration and injunction and the suit property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and the only the respondents 1, 5, 6, 7 & 8 are residing outside the jurisdiction of this Court, thereby pleaded to allow the present application. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and perused the documents placed on record. 4. Considering the fact that the applicant/plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration, permanent injunction, for damages and costs and taking note of the fact that the suit property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court and the respondents 1, 5, 6, 7 & 8 are residing outside the jurisdiction of this Court, therefore, the present application deserves to be allowed and accordingly, the same is allowed. Leave is granted. 5. Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. 26-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No DN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1008 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 P.DHANABAL J. DN A No. 1008 of 2026 AND CS SR NO. 27313 OF 2026 26-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis