Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7194 (JHR)

SANJIT KUMAR DEO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.M.P./351/2026 · 2026-04-24

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12116 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 351 of 2026 --- 1. Sanjit Kumar Deo, son of Shri Ramchandra Deo, resident of Village & P.O.- Punai, P.S.- Daru, District- Hazaribagh 2. Sourav Tiwari, son of Shri L.P. Tiwari, resident of Ward No. 10, Gali No. 2, P.O. & P.S.- Chakradharpur, District- West Singhbhum at Chaibasa 3. Ranjan Tiwari, son of Lal Bihari Tiwari, resident of Village- Shitalpur, P.O.- Nokha, P.S.- Garu Nokha, District- Rohtas, Bihar 4. Ramdas Bhagat, son of Late Bishwas Bhagat, resident of Village- BadriKaram Toli, P.O.- Puto, P.S. Ghagra, District- Gumla 5. Pravin Kumar Rana, son of Bishweshwar Rana, resident of Village, P.O. & P.S.- Gighour, District- Chatra 6. Prem Prakash Oraon, son of Late Thakur Oraon, resident of Village- Arashana, P.O.- Badla, P.S.- Senha, District- Lohardaga 7. Ashok Kumar, son of P.S. Munda, resident of Near Budhia School, New Area, Morabadi, P.O.- Ranchi University, P.S.- Bariyatu, District- Ranchi … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Excise & Prohibition, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 5. The Secretary, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Ranchi …. … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Ms. Neha Pandey, Advocate For the Resp.- State : Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, G.A.-I Ms. Parul Parasar, A.C. to G.A.-I For the Resp.-JPSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate Mr. jay Prakash, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate Order No. 02 Dated: 24.04.2026 The present C.M.P. has been filed for restoration of W.P.(S) No. 5845 of 2022 which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 16.05.2024. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the present C.M.P., W.P.(S) No. 5845 of 2022 is restored to its original file and stage, subject to the condition that 2026:JHHC:12116 2 the petitioners pay a cost of Rs.1,000/- in favour of the Advocate’s Clerks Association Welfare Fund, Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi and remove the remaining defects pointed out by the office by 08.05.2026. 3. The present C.M.P. is, accordingly, disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) April 24, 2026 Ritesh/ Uploaded on 27.04.2026