Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7190 (KAR)

SRI. S. B. RAMESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19511/2025 · 2026-02-21

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10952 WP No. 19511 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 19511 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. S.B. RAMESH S/O LATE SRI S.K. BOMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT SATHYAMANGALA EXTENSION, KHB, HASSAN - 573 201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VASANTH KUMAR H.T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT, HASSAN - 573 201 3. THE COMMISSIONER URBAN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, HASSAN - 573 201 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10952 WP No. 19511 of 2025 4. THE COMMISSIONER MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HASSAN - 573 201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. G.M. ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO WHEREFORE, FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED REASONS THE PETITIONER RESPECTFULLY PRAYS THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 24-03-2025 VIDE ANNEXURE J. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 24-03-2025 vide Annexure - J. insofar as Petitioner concerned b. Pass any order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10952 WP No. 19511 of 2025 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation dated 24.03.2025 at Annexure-J has not been considered by the respondents. By way of the said representation, a request has been made for formal approval. As such, the petitioner is before this Court seeking for the aforesaid reliefs. 3. Whenever any representation is submitted, it is but required for the Statutory Authorities to consider the same and pass necessary orders either by accepting or rejecting. Needless to say, in either case to be accompanied by reasons. In the present matter neither having been done, I pass the following: ORDER i) Writ petition is allowed. ii) A Mandamus is issued directing respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2025 at Annexure-J and pass necessary orders in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10952 WP No. 19511 of 2025 iii) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11