ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/33474/2026 · 2026-09-16
Prakash Padia, Vivek Saran
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7189 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7189 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33474 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court petitioners are present before this Court.
2. In paragraph-9 of the supplementary affidavit petitioners have sought for unconditional apology for the error committed by them by not disclosing the facts regarding the filing of earlier writ petition.
3. Taking a lenient view, we dismiss the present writ petition by imposing a cost of Rs.5,000/-, which shall be deposited by the petitioners in favour of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad within three weeks from today and further submit the receipt of deposit before the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar. However, in case aforesaid cost is not deposited by the petitioner within the period stated above, the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar is directed to initiate proceedings for recovery of aforesaid amount from the petitioners within one month.
4. The personal appearance of petitioners, who are identified by their counsel, are exempted.
5. Registrar (Compliance) is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar forthwith. September 17, 2026/Pramod Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Agrawal, C.S.C., Shrey Singh (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Arun Kumar Shukla And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad