Bipul Singh @ Muthan Singh @ Bipul Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./23493/2026 · 2026-04-08
Partha Sarthy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7187 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7187 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23493 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2025 Thana- Gaura P.S. District- Saran ======================================================
1. Bipul Singh @ Muthan Singh @ Bipul Kumar Son of Muna Singh @ Surendra Singh Resident of Village- Rampur (Khoram) PS- Gaura District -Saran at Chapra
2. Patar Singh @ Neraj Singh Son of Kameshwar Singh @ Kheshari Singh Resident of Village- Rampur (Khoram) PS- Gaura District -Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Udai Shankar Singh, Advocate Mr. Jivitesh Sisodia, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sarvan Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 08-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gaura P.S. Case no.187 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 109 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, nine named accused persons are said to have come armed with lathi, danda, farsa etc. It is stated by the informant that they started to abuse and assault the informant and others. Rajesh Singh, Golu Singh and the petitioner no.1 assaulted the informant with a farsa. As a result of assault by Rajesh Singh with farsa, the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23493 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/3 sustained injury on his head. It is further stated that in the assault by all the accused persons, the informant and others sustained injuries. On the intervention of the villagers, they were saved. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. No such occurrence as alleged has taken place. Even as per the FIR, the informant sustained injury as a result of assault by Rajesh Singh. The allegations against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. They are in custody since 4.2.2026 and undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
Learned counsel for the informant submits that besides both the petitioners being named in the FIR, there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner no.1 of having assaulted the informant with a farsa along with two others causing serious injuries. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the informant stating about the injury having been sustained by him as a result of assault with farsa by co-accused Rajesh Singh
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23493 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 3/3 together with the petitioners being in custody since 4.2.2026, both the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Gaura P.S. Case no.187 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chapra, Saran. Shiv/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T