Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010105912026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./774/2026 KESHAB SHARMA S/O BANAMALI SHARMA R/O - VILL HOUSE NO. 29 GHUNGOOR KUARPAR P.S SILCHAR , DIST - CACHAR, ASSAM- 788010 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. L R MAZUMDER, MR. A ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 02.06.2026
1. Heard Mr. L. R. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for quashing the proceeding of PRC Case No. 171/2025 pending in the Court of learned CJM, Cachar, Silchar arising out of Silchar P. S. Case No. 1998/2023 corresponding
to
GR
No.
3782/2023
under
Sections
Page No.# 2/2 143/341/336/353/325/333/427 IPC read with Section 3 of PDPP Act.
3. The petitioner, Keshab Sharma has been shown as an accused in the charge- sheet. He has received summons from the Court below. He apprehends that he appears before the learned Court below in response to the summons, he will be remanded to custody.
4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides.
5. The apprehension of the petitioner is baseless when summons are issued, the petitioner should appear before the Trial Court for seeking regular bail. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Trial Court and to seek regular bail.
6. With the aforesaid direction, this criminal petition stands disposed of. JUDGE
Comparing Assistant