- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12604 WP No. 2843 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.2843 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SANNAPUTTAMMA, W/O LATE SIDRAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS 2. SRI. NATARAJU E S S/O LATE SIDRAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS PETITIONERRS NO.1 & 2 ARE R/AT VADAVANA HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, KONANURU HOBLI, ARAKALAGUDU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. 3. SMT. SUJATHA D/O LATE SIDRAMEGOWDA W/O KUCHELA M S AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT MALALI VILLAGE, KESTUR POST, CHUNCHANAKATTE HOBLI, K R NAGAR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANIRUDH CHAMUNDA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12604 WP No. 2843 of 2026 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION, PANDAVAPURA, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 434 3. THE TAHSILDAR, K.R PET TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 426 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) CALL FOR RECORDS RELATING TO THE PROCEEDINGS BEARING NO.KJP- 1-07009-2012-13 ON THE FILE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION, PANDAVAPURA; b) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDERS AT ANNEXURE-B DATED 23-03-2015 PASSED BY THE PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION, PANDAVAPURA AND ETC THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12604 WP No. 2843 of 2026 2. This writ petition has been filed aggrieved by the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner in proceedings bearing No.Bhusu:Parshilane:46/2013-14 dated 27.03.2015 at Annexure-B 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice to the petitioners. It is further submitted that under similar circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021 remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate points out from the impugned order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioners and in spite of notice having been issued, the petitioners did not appear before the Assistant Commissioner. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12604 WP No. 2843 of 2026 5. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no proceedings were pending before any court/authority. 6. This Court had several occasions to consider such cases, where writ petitions are filed long after the provisions contained in Sections 79A, 79B and 79C were omitted from the statute book in terms of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020. It is the consistent opinion of this Court that if at any rate, the Assistant Commissioner, after forfeiting the land has not disposed of the same in accordance with law then the benefit of the saving clause contained in Section 12 of the Amending Act is required to be given to such petitioners. The Assistant Commissioner is therefore, required to ascertain, whether the declared excess lands or forfeited lands still remain with the State Government or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the proceedings have - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12604 WP No. 2843 of 2026 reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply and all further proceedings shall be declared as abated by the Assistant Commissioner. 7. Having considered the submission of the learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co- ordinate Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co- ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioners herein. 8. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assistant Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioners including the consequences of the subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12604 WP No. 2843 of 2026 Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act in Karnataka Amendment No.56 of 2020. iii) If revenue entries have been altered pursuant to the impugned order dated 27.03.2015, the same shall be restored in favour of the petitioners. iv) The petitioners shall appear before the respondent-Assistant Commissioner on 23.03.2026, without waiting for further notice from the Assistant Commissioner. Ordered accordingly. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2