[2026:RJ-JP:21215] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9105/2026 1. Nasim S/o Shri Islam, aged about 33 Years, R/o Nagapuri Farm Hause, Agra Road, Jagatpura, Jaipur, owner of Truck Bearing Number RJ-14GR-4926. 2. Shiv Building Meterial Supplier, through its proprietor Shiv Tanwar S/o Shri Sukhveer Tanwar registered office at House No.801, Gothra, Mohbtabad, Pali(13), Faridabad, (Haryana), Owner of Truck Beaing No. HR-38AJ-6113. 3. Abbash S/o Shri Jakariya, R/o H No.56, Zama Masjid Tonka (275), Palwal, (Haryana), owner of truck Bearing Number HR-73B-8327. 4. Krishan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Badri Prasad Sharma, R/o 2935, Gali No.1, Sanjay Enclave, Sec-22, Faridabad, (Haryana), owner of Truck Bearing Number HR-73A-9320. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Joint Secretary, Mines and Geology Department, Secretrait, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 3. Regional Transport Officer, Bharatpur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, Alwar. 5. District Transport Officer, Kotputali, District Kotputali Behror. 6. Regional Transport Officer, Sikar 7. Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur First. 8. Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur-II. 9. Regional Transport Officer, Ajmer. 10. District Transport Officer, Kekari. 11. District Transport Officer, Beawar District Ajmer. 12. District Transport Officer, Jhunjhunu. 13. District Transport Officer, Bhiwadi, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaswant Sharma Mr. Morvi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. S.S. Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order [2026:RJ-JP:21215] (2 of 3) [CW-9105/2026] 20/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2 2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners were suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the petitioners were not afforded the opportunity of hearing and that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. 3. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioners will produce their vehicles before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicles’ make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicles to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/inspection and shall not authorize the vehicles to ply on the road for any other purpose. 5. The petitioners, along with their vehicle concerned, shall report to / before the respective DTOs who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicles, on 04.06.2026, 1 S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025 2 S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025 [2026:RJ-JP:21215] (3 of 3) [CW-9105/2026] preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioners. 6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 22.06.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-49