Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7175 (BOM)

VINOD MARUTI GAIKWAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

ABA/1594/2026 · 2026-09-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

927-ABA-1594-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1594 OF 2026 Vinod Maruti Gaikwad VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another Mr. N. B. Narwade h/f Mr. R. V. Gore, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. P. Joshi, APP for Respondent No. 1 Adv. V. M. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 (appointed) CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J DATE :SEPTEMBER 08, 2026 P. C. : 1. After hearing learned Counsels for both sides and when this Court has shown its disinclination to grant any relief, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the Application. 2. In view of this, Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Fees of appointed Counsel for Respondent No. 2 is quantified @ Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) to be paid by High Court Legal Aid Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Malani 2026:BHC-AUG:41393