Thenmozhi v. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/3890/2026 · 2026-02-17
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 71721 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 71721 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 3890 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 3890 of 2026 Thenmozhi W/o.Ashok Kumar, No.1/372, Kuttai Street, GRP,Periya Colony, Villupuram Taulk, Villupuram District-605602. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Villupuram West Police Station, Villupuram District. Crime No. 320/2025. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest on connection with Crime No. 320/2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): D.Balaji For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 3890 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(C),4(1-A)(ii) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, in Crime No.320 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 7 Men Club Brandy bottles each containing 180 ml without any valid permission for the purpose of illegally selling the same and also enriching himself. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 7 Men Club Brandy bottles each containing 180 ml without any proper license. He would also submit that there are 31 previous cases, pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 3890 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the nature of offence committed by the petitioner, and taking note of the fact that there are 31 previous cases, pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 17-02-2026 MPA To
1. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Villupuram West Police Station, Villupuram District. Crime No. 320/2025. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 3890 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.RAJASEKAR, J. MPA CRL OP No. 3890 of 2026 17-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis