Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
09.04.2026 Court No.28 Item No.30 ssi CRM (A) 1091 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 1036 of 2025 dated 06.12.2025 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS 2023. And In the matter of: Jaidur Rahaman …. Petitioner
Mr. Ali Ahsan Alamgir Ms. Soma Mal Ms. Rabia Khatoon Ms. June Modak …for the petitioner
Ms. Manisha Sharma Mr. Sourat Nandy
…for the State
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. A scuffle took place between neighbours. However, no grievous injuries were caused.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. She submits that the petitioner is the principal accused who caused a grievous injury on a vital part of the body of the victim lady, like the head. She also received injuries on other portion of her body. Reliance is placed on the injury report and the statements of witnesses.
Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the alleged role ascribed to the present petitioner, I do not consider this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
2
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)