HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29330 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.114 out of 114) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Aushim Luthra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first bail application was dismissed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.06.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.17347 of 2025, on the ground that the applicant was the primary offender. 4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.83 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 3(5), 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66C, 66D I.T. Act, 2008, Police Station Cyber Crime, District Meerut, during the pendency of trial. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The primary offender is Mohammad Aasif alias Mohammad Sippa. Not a single penny has been transferred to the account of the applicant. It is true that there are several transactions between the applicant and the co-accused, but the applicant has nothing to do with the said transactions. The main accused, namely, Tasin Ali, has also been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.08.2026 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11114 of 2025. Hence, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aushim Luthra, Harishchandra Yadav, Utkarshni Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Naushad .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) the applicant, having an identical role and no previous criminal history, is entitled to bail on parity. He is in jail since 07.04.2025 and will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However, the aforesaid factual aspect of the parity to the co-accused has not been disputed by him. 7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the main accused person Tasin Ali has been enlarged on bail, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. 8. Let the applicant- Naushad, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 17, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 29330 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad