Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 71629 (MAD)

A.Dhanabal v. The state rep.by, Inspector of Police

CRL OP/3673/2026 · 2026-02-16

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.3673 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.3673 of 2026 A.Dhanabal ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Crime No.33 of 2026 MGR Nagar Police Station, Chennai 600 083. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.33 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vinayaga Vishnu For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3673 of 2026 O R D E R The petitioner herein apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1) of BNS in Crime No.33 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner herein is the son of the defacto complainant ( father) attacked him since his father has advised him not to indulge in attacking his wife and used the photo frame caused severe injuries, which resulted in causing multiple injuries, and admitted in hospital. Hence, the case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and due to sudden quarrel, the occurrence had taken place. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has no previous cases. He further submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3673 of 2026 however the victim sustained grievous injuries. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the nature of allegation that the petitioner had attacked his very own father caused grievous injuries, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 16.02.2026 sma To 1. The Inspector of Police, Crime No.33 of 2026 MGR Nagar Police Station, Chennai 600 083. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3673 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR, J. sma Crl.O.P.No.3673 of 2026 16.02.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis