Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7162 (CAL)

SAYANI BANERJEE PAKIRA v. VICTOR PAKIRA

CO/846/2025 · 2026-04-09

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.04.2026 SL-01 Ct. No. 42 Srimanta OP In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side CO 846 of 2025 Smt. Sayanti Banerjee (Pakira) -Vs.- Victor Pakira Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury, Ms. Esha Basak …for the petitioner. Ms. Joyasmita Bhattacharjee …for the opposite party. 1. Ms. Joyasmita Bhattacharjee, learned Advocate has filed vakalatnama for opposite party/husband and has filed a written instruction on behalf of the opposite party/husband to the effect that he does not want to proceed with MAT Suit No. 398/2024 pending before the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Chandannagar, Hooghly. The opposite party/husband is present in person and submits that he would withdraw the MAT Suit No. 398/2024 from the concerned Court. 2 2. The learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Chandannagar, Hooghly shall pass an appropriate order on the withdrawal application being moved. 3. In view of the submissions made the present petition becomes infructuous and hence disposed of. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)