Ct.No.1 D/L 09.04.2026 01 Saikat Mukherjee CPAN/251/2003 TANUJA CHOWDHURY VS. S.K. NARULA Mr. Swapan Kr. Datta, G.P. Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Adv. …For the Respondent-State Dictated by Partha Sarathi Sen, J. 1. None for the applicant/petitioner. 2. Respondent-State is represented. 3. It is a matter of 2003. We have every reason to believe that the petitioner has lost his interest in proceeding with the instant matter and/or the matter becomes infructuous on account of passage of time. 4. In view of such, the instant contempt application is dismissed for default. (SUJOY PAUL, CJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)