Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17245-DB CCC No. 1043 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1043 OF 2024 (-) BETWEEN:
1.
FAZLER RAHMAN S/O LATE HAJI A.R.ABDUL AZEEZ, AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS,
2. A.F.DUREZ S/O FAZLER RAHMAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT NO.536, 16TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, BEHIND BDA COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 034.
PERMANENT ADDRESS BAITUL FAZAL, OPP.SHANKAR MUTT ROAD, K.R.PURAM, HASSAN-563 201.
3.
TANVIR JABBAR S/O ABDUL JABBAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.819, K.R.PURAM, HASSAN-573 201.
4.
AZAM ALI S/O LATE ZAFAR ALI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, KOHINOOR HOUSE,
Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17245-DB CCC No. 1043 of 2024
D.NO.81, VALLABHAI ROAD, HASSAN-563 201. …COMPLAINANTS
(BY SRI. ANANDA CHAKRAVARTI., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AJESH KUMAR.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
MR. ATHMARAM SHETTY VIJAYA BANK, BRANCH MANAGER, (EARLIER KNOWN AS THE BANK OF BARODA) HASSAN MAIN BRANCH, KURTHIKA ARCADE, H.N.PURA ROAD, HASSAN-563 201. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY., ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED BANK HEREIN AND PUNISH THEM FOR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF ORDER DATED 23.02.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP NO.21951/2022 C/W WP NO.21725/2022 C/W WP NO. 21752/2022 AS PER ANNEXURE- A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17245-DB CCC No. 1043 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the Contempt of Court Case need not be proceeded with. A memo to that effect is also placed on record. In the above view of the matter, the complainant is permitted to withdraw this Contempt of Court Case. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Notice, if any, issued shall stand discharged.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE YKL List No.: 3 Sl No.: 33