Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7159 (RAJ)

RAMSINGH S/O SHRI GIRRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7090/2026 · 2026-05-12

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:19992] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7090/2026 Ramsingh S/o Shri Girraj, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Bamniya, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk, Rajasthan, District Tonk (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 12/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Sec- tion 483 of BNSS in FIR No.71/2026 registered at Police Station Uniara, District Tonk for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) ,333, 3(5) and 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to the some dispute relating to giving side on the road, the petitioner has been involved in the matter on false and concocted grounds. He again submitted that though there is allegation of the recovery of one pistol from the petitioner however no charge of the Arms Act has been mentioned in the material available on record. He also submitted that the in- [2026:RJ-JP:19992] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7090/2026] juries assigned to the present petitioner are simple in nature. Peti- tioner is behind the bars since 12.04.2026 with two antecedent out of which in one case he is already on bail. Co-accused Ra- jababu has been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court on 27.04.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the peti- tioner in further custody, consequently the bail application de- serves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material avail- able on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/ demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ramsingh S/o Shri Girraj, be released on bail provided he furnishes a per- sonal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J RACHNA/60