Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7152 (GAU)

MANTU MIAH v. THE UNION OF INDIA

AB/627/2026 · 2026-05-31

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010054802026 2026:GAU-AS:7581 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/627/2026 MANTU MIAH S/O LATE TUTA MIAH R/O NABIN NAGR, P.S. BISHALGARH, DIST. SIPAHI ZILLA, TRIPURA, PIN- 799102 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE TO BE REPRESENTED BY CENTRAL GOVT. STANDING COUNSEL, GUWAHATI-781001. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M H RAJBARBHUIYAN, MRS R CHETRI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, DRI, :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R 01.06.2026 Heard Mr. M.H. Rajbarbhuiyan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, Standing Counsel, D.R.I. Page No.# 2/2 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for pre-arrest bail in respect of NDPS Case No.36/2024 pending in the court of the learned Special Judge, Cachar, Silchar. 3. On 31.05.2024, the anticipatory bail application of the present petitioner was rejected by this Court in AB No.788/2024. While filing the present application, no new ground has been pleaded. The petitioner has been absconding for a long time. In Balmukund Singh Gautam v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr., reported in 2026 Legal Eagle (SC) 159, the Supreme Court has already held that as a general rule an absconder is not entitled to anticipatory bail. 4. For the aforesaid two reasons, the present bail application of the present petitioner is dismissed and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant