[2026:RJ-JP:19180] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6293/2026 Udaibhan Singh S/o Prakashnarayan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Patel Nagar, Near Mandawara Phatak, Police Station Nayimandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli. (Presently Confined At Sub Jail Hindaun City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Jiya UR Rahman HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.90/2026 registered at Police Station New Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli for offences under Sections 191(2), 193(3), 190, 109(1), 351(2), 351(3) and 352 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he used a firearm and caused injury to the injured, Ashok. However, as per the injury report, none of the injuries are on any vital part of the body. Both injuries are alleged to have been caused on the right thigh of the injured. From this, it can be reasonably inferred that the said injuries are not life-threatening in nature. It is also [2026:RJ-JP:19180] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6293/2026] submitted that prior to the registration of the present FIR, FIR No. 89/2026 had already been registered at the instance of the petitioner’s side against the complainant side. The present FIR appears to have been lodged as a counterblast on false and concocted grounds. It is further submitted that the co-accused, Rajbhan Singh, has already been enlarged on bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 02.04.2026. The petitioner has been in custody since 20.03.2026 and has no prior criminal antecedents. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Udaibhan Singh S/o Prakashnarayan, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/57