2026:JHHC:5580 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 526 of 2026 --------- 1. Sk. Rahmat Ali @ Milu, aged about 24 years, 2. Sahid Hussain @ Nengdi, aged about 20 years, Both are Sons of Sheikh Samsuddin, resident of Muslim Basti, Near Niche Masjid, P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, District-Saraikella-Kharsawan (Jharkhand). ....Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Ms. Saman Ahmad, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Sushma Aind, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-25.02.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioners for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 309(6)/109/317(2)/3(5) of B.N.S. and charge has been framed under Sections 309(6)/109/317(2)/3(5) of B.N.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. She further submits that the petitioners were neither arrested on the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from their possession and the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. She further submits that the petitioners for no offence have been languishing in custody since 16.03.2025; as such, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. She submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioners coupled with the fact that the petitioners are in custody since 16.03.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge these petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Saraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 80 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No.162 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against these petitioners, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of these petitioners. (Deepak Roshan, J.) FEBRUARY 25, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 27.02.2026