Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7148 (HP)

NIA v. SOMMAYA

CMP/3066/2026 · 2026-03-11

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

NIAC Ltd. Vs. Som Maya Shaipy & Ors. CMPs No. 3065 & 3066/2026 in FAO No. 48/2013 11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents. CMP No. 3066/2026 The present application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed by applicant/respondent No. 3, Abhishek Shaipy, for discharging his natural guardian, as he has attained the age of majority. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the applicant/appellant has submitted that he has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant and also taking into consideration the fact that the applicant has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from matriculation certificate, appended with the application as Annexure A-2, wherein his date of birth has been mentioned as 18.11.2007, the present application is allowed and natural guardianship of applicant/respondent ...2... No. 3, Abhishek Shaipy is ordered to be discharged and he is permitted to pursue the case in his own capacity. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 3065/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 3, Abhishek Shaipy, for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the applicant/appellant has submitted that he has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as the award has attained finality and no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, coupled with the fact that the award has attained finality, as till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court, the same is allowed and the amount lying deposited in the Registry of ….3…. this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicant/respondent No. 3, Abhishek Shaipy, as per his share, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to his bank account, details whereof have been given in para-4 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 11th March, 2026 (raman)