Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010089152026 2026:GAU-AS:7566- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./79/2026 H. DEBASISH SINGHA AND 2 ORS S/O SAMARESH CHAKRABORTY, COLLEGE ROAD, SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 788004 2: PAPIA DESHMUKHYA DAUGHTER OF PRAVASH CHANDRA DESHMUKHYA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TARAPUR PART-VII P.S. SILCHAR SADAR SUB- DIVISION SILCHAR IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788003. 3: NIRUPAM SAHA SON OF - SRI UTTAM KUMAR SAHA RESIDENT OF P.W.D. QUARTER SADAR GHAT SILCHAR P.S.- SILCHAR P.O. SILCHAR IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR ASSAM SILCHAR- 788001 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER Page No.# 2/3 PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 781037 IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM. 3:THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEPARTMENT PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 781037 IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP(METRO) ASSAM. 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CACHAR DISTRICT SILCHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001. 5:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (DRDA) CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001. 6:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SONAI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788006. 7:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SALCHAPRA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788814. 8:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BARJALENGA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788117 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D. Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 01-06-2026 Heard Ms. S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. H. M. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. The order dated 06.02.2026 passed in WP(C) No. 3047/2018 and WP(C) No. 1070/2018, which is sought to be reviewed in the present proceeding, is an order dismissing the said writ petitions for non- prosecution. This Court is of the considered view that, once a proceeding has been dismissed for non-prosecution, the appropriate remedy available to the aggrieved party is to seek restoration or recall of the order by filing an appropriate application. In view of the above, the present review petition being not maintainable, is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for restoration/recall of the order dated 06.02.2026, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant