HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35672 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel appearing for the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority. 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that when the petitioner received a notice with regard to non payment of installation charges of water connection, he paid the same under protest. Post payment of the installation charge under protest, a representation has been made by the petitioner to the 1.7.2026 stating that, in fact, only one water connection has been given to the petitioner and that the installation charge for the other connection has wrongly been charged. 3. Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel appearing for the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority states that the representation of the petitioner dated 1.7.2026 shall be decided expeditiously. 4. Accordingly, without entering into the merit of the claim of the petitioner, we direct the Khandiya Lekhakar (Jal Rajaswa), New Okhla Industrial Development Authority to decide the aforesaid representation Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Parijat Srivastava, Shadab Alam Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kaushalendra Nath Singh Ashok Kumar Jain .....Petitioner(s) Senior Manager .....Respondent(s) of the petitioner dated 1.7.2026 expeditiously, preferably within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. September 16, 2026 Rakesh WRIC No. 35672 of 2026 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad