RIYASAT ALI ALIAS DHUDHYA S/O LIYAKAT ALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6090/2026 · 2026-05-04
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7140 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7140 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:18914] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6090/2026 Riyasat Ali Alias Dhudhya S/o Liyakat Ali, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Near Shyopuriya Masjid, Baran Police Station Kotwali Baran, Distt. Baran (Raj.) (Presently Confined At District Jail, Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwajeet Mantri with Ms. Bismad Kaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 04/05/2026
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Riyasat Ali Alias Dhudhya S/o Liyakat Ali, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.44/2026 dated 13.01.2026 registered at P.S. Kotwali Baran District - Baran , for the offence under Sections 8/21, 8/29, 8/30 of NDPS Act, 27 of The Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Section 111(2)(B) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the
[2026:RJ-JP:18914] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-6090/2026] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is an innocent person and falsely implicated in the instant case as no recovery has been effected from him. He further submitted that after investigation, charge sheet has already been filed. He further referred to order dated 29.01.2026 and submitted that accused Shakir, on whose information present petitioner was added as an accused, was already granted bail by a coordinate Bench. He also submitted that other accused were granted bail in the matter. He also referred conclusion drawn by the Investigating Officer and submitted that the allegations upon the present petitioner is selling heroin after mixing with avil injection, but no recovery was effected from the petitioner. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the interrogation note, case diary and material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On 13.01.2026, SHO, Police Station Kotwali, has received an information about involvement of Shakir in dealing and selling of contraband/narcotics and, on secret information, they have intercepted Shakir, Hassan and Anwar Hussain. The police has recovered avil injection, injection syringe and 1.0 gram smack. During investigation, it has come to the
[2026:RJ-JP:18914] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-6090/2026] notice that present petitioner is also involved in preparing injections for consumption by drug addicts. 7. Present petitioner was arrested on 30.03.2026 and since then he is in custody. No recovery was effected at the instance of petitioner. On the basis of information given by other accused, petitioner was named as an accused. Co- accused Jashoda Bai was released on bail on 28.04.2026 whereas Shakir was released on bail by a coordinate Bench on 29.01.2026. Present petitioner is a paramedical staff, thus, considering the material available on record, it is a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 9.
Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Riyasat Ali Alias Dhudhya S/o Liyakat Ali,, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. [2026:RJ-JP:18914] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-6090/2026] (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /50