Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7138 (CAL)

MOLINA CHAKRABORTY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/24094/2025 · 2026-04-07

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.04.2026 Item no. 40 Court no. 30 g.b. 266012 WPA 24094 of 2025 Smt. Molina Chakraborty Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Subhendu Banerjee …..For the Petitioner Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty Ms. Mohana Das Mr. Rahul Singh …… For the Maheshtala Municipality 1. The writ application has been preferred being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent/Municipal Authorities in not considering the petitioner’s application for water connection, submitted on 22.04.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the Maheshtala Municipality submits that he needs to take instructions in the said matter. 3. Considering that water is an essential requirement and the petitioner’s prayer is pending since 22.04.2024, the respondent/Municipality is directed to consider the application dated 22.04.2024 submitted by the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of this order on giving an appropriate hearing to the parties and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. 4. In case the petitioner’s application for water connection is in accordance with law and if the petitioner meets all legal requirements, then water connection be provided within seven days thereafter. 5. The writ application stands disposed of. 6. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties after completion of all necessary formalities. ( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.) 2