Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7131 (ALL)

RAJESH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/31791/2026 · 2026-09-16

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31791 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.34 out of 114) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Ms. Vanshika Kesharwani, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vijay Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.115 of 2026, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Highway, District- Mathura, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of two criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. The criminal history of four cases assigned to the applicant stands explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 04.02.2026. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. On the other hand, learned State Law Officer opposed the prayer for bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Girish Kumar, Vijay Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajesh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Rajesh, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 7. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. September 17, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 31791 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad