PRADEEP KUMAR MEENA S/O MATADEEN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6066/2026 · 2026-05-06
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7130 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7130 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:19074] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.6066/2026 Pradeep Kumar Meena S/o Matadeen, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Sunari, Police Thana Babai, District Neemkathana Hall District Jhunjhunu Raj. (Accused At Presently Confined In Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp, Jhunjhunu, Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Omveer Singh Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 06/05/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.19/2024, registered at Police Station Gothda, District Jhunjhunu, for the offence(s) under Sections 379 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated under Sections 379, 413 and 414 of IPC. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2024 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner is a habitual
[2026:RJ-JP:19074] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6066/2026] offender and against him 17 criminal cases are pending, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the long incarceration of the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Pradeep Kumar Meena S/o Matadeen, in connection with FIR No.19/2024, registered at Police Station Gothda, District Jhunjhunu, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused- petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is directed to mark his presence on every second and fourth Saturday of each month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the
[2026:RJ-JP:19074] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6066/2026] accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number.
In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-39