Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 713 (GAU)

LUTFA BEGUM v. THE UNION OF INDIA

I.A.(Civil)/901/2026 · 2026-03-24

Kalyan Rai Surana, Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010057192026 2026:GAU-AS:4299- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/901/2026 LUTFA BEGUM D/O MD. NASER ALI LATE NOSER ALI NASERR/O VILL- BORGHOPABILOR PATHAR,F.S. GORBARDHANA, DISTRICT - BAKSA,ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONERAND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OFINDIA, DEPARTMENT OF HOME,SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI -110001. 2:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER INDIA NEW DELHI PIN-110001 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF HOME DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 4:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR ASSAM NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-5 ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) BARPETA P.O. AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301 6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BARPETA DISTRICT P.O. AND P.S.- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78130 Advocate for the Petitioner : K U AHMED, E DEVI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, ECI,SC, F.T,SC, NRC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 25.03.2026 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. K.U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. J. Sarma, learned CGC; Ms. A. Verma, learned standing counsel for the FT & Border matters; Mr. M. Singha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. S. Katakey, learned standing counsel for the ECI; and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate for the State respondent. 2. By filing this interlocutory application, it has been submitted that due to reorganization of the district and jurisdictional changes, the case of the petitioner is now being dealt with the Superintendent of Police (B), Baksa and therefore, the applicant seeks to implead the Superintendent of Police (B), Baksa and the District Commissioner, Baksa, whose particulars are given in Page No.# 3/3 paragraph 4 as respondent no.7 and 8 respectively. 3. Having heard the learned CGC, State and Departmental counsel, the prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant