HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 14606 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the revisional court remanding the proceedings before the court below. 3. The revisional court has not committed any illegality in remanding the proceedings for deciding afresh before the court below. 4. In view of the above, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to contest the proceedings before the court below where the proceedings is pending. April 20, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shreesh Srivastava, Sushil Kumar Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Gangacharan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad