Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7126 (CHH)

SATYENDRA PRATAP CHANDRA v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/192/2022 · 2026-04-24

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19171 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 192 of 2022 * - Satyendra Pratap Chandra S/o Shri Rishi Kumar Chandra Aged About 28 Years Occupation Contract Lab Technician (Virology) Late Shri Lakhiram Agrawal Memorial Medical College Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Health Services Directorate Indirawati Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - President (Adhisthata) Pt. J.N.M. Medical College Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 – Registrar, Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ quashing the condition No. 2 of Impugned advertisement dated 20.12.2021 (Annexure P-1) which relates to passing of diploma of Pathology Technician from Govt. Institutions. 10.2 That this Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner for submitting application form having the diploma from Private Institution and registered under Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.25 18:20:49 +0530 2 10.3 That this Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned advertisement and directed the respondent No. 3 to issue the fresh advertisement as per norms of Indian Medical Council dated 03.06.2020. 10.4 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti